Archive for the 'Leadership' Category

What Place Anger?

The video I posted yesterday, wherein Robert Egger hands Rush Limbaugh his head on a plate, has drawn two very different responses. (Update: The original video is here – video at yesterday’s site has been updated to exclude the “offensive” portions.)

One response is, “Yes, right on! And I love the ending!”

The other, diametrically opposed, is, “You had me until the end. Hold your anger, Robert. Take the high road.”

Those of you who are regular readers here have watched me walk that same line – the line between gentle encouragement and downright indignation.  Like Robert, I have received the same comments when my normally understanding side is overpowered by my “righteous indignation” side.

Watching the response to Robert’s video, both here at the blog and especially in social media circles, I cannot help but wonder:

  • What is the place for anger in creating social change?
  • Does social change require a bit of poking and prodding around the edges? Is it inherently about the balance and blend of anger and higher ground?
  • Isn’t anger part of who we are as humans?  Isn’t it something we all feel at times? Would that not make it ok to express that?  Or is it always about reaching  for the high road?
  • If our highest potential for compassionate, joyful living is reached by walking the talk of that potential, what is the highest potential for what we do with our anger?
  • Is there a place for periodic explosion, for someone to express what we are all feeling, and then, as Robert does every day, get on with the very real work of making change from the higher ground?  Does social change need a provocateur to balance what my friend Renata Rafferty calls “The Tyranny of the Nice”?

In the U.S. over the past 2 years, we have seen the result of anger from a place of fear.  What of anger from a place of aspiration? Is such a thing even possible?

Because I myself am a provocateur, I wrestle with this in my own writing and speaking.  I know that my own anger tends to arise not from fear, but from my own personal intolerance for the intolerance of others. (Yes, I know, I’m working on that. Just ‘fessing up to my own demons here!)

And so I cannot help but wonder:
What place does anger have in creating social change?

Giving Boards Time to Think

Statue - Girl on PillowYesterday I lamented that we all feel we don’t have time to think. And that the reason we don’t have time to think is that we don’t make time to think. Which is to say that we don’t value thinking near as much as we value doing.

Nowhere is this more evident than in the board rooms of Community Benefit Organizations.

Last week alone I was coaching two different board chairs who were concerned that their boards did not want to discuss “vision.”  In both cases, their board members had told them outright that they thought the discussions of vision would be a waste of time; instead, they wanted to focus on DOING something.

In both those cases, the chairs chose the road less taken. They both stepped back from “doing” to facilitate the question, “If we were 100% successful, what would our community look like? What would be different? For whom?”

In both cases, the meetings were more energized and engaged than either of the groups could remember being.

And in both cases, the groups said afterwards, “We needed this. It provides context. It is a different way of thinking, but that is precisely where we need to be.”

This goes directly counter to what “experts” tell boards they are supposed to be focusing their precious time on. Boards (and many governance gurus) see such discussion as a luxury they wish they had more time for but “our board members are so busy and we have so little time together that we have to focus on what’s important…”

It may be fine to consider such exploratory, open-ended conversations at the beginning of an annual retreat, but boards insist they cannot afford to spend time every month on this “touchy feely” stuff.

And you know, I would be ok with that if the current means-and-doing-focused board work were actually creating results. But we all know that is not the case.

(If you are viewing this in email, here is the video link.)

So where can a board even start? What first steps can a board take, to begin to change the “means and doing” focus to a focus on the difference they want to make in their community?

The simplest step is to start your meetings with a meaningful question. Spend even just the first 10 minutes discussing that question. Not a report, not a speaker – real discussion. Time to think. Time to focus.

Start with energy about the difference you want to make. And let that guide the rest of the board’s conversations.

Some of the most interesting consideration of Boards as Learning Communities happens at Debra Beck’s blog. I recommend it as a great source of inspiration for boards who want to spend more time thinking.

No Time to Think

Candle

The conversation I shared yesterday, with a young social change agent trying to find his path, brought up for me an issue that is glaringly absent in almost all discussions of “best practice” in the social change arena.

Put simply, we devalue thinking, exploring, experimenting. What we value is “doing.”
When individuals take time for exploring interests – learning for the sake of learning – we consider it a luxury, a recreational activity.  And the staffs and boards of organizations? Truly, time for thinking and exploring has absolutely no place in organizations, period.
In a workshop I taught in New Zealand this past spring, a gentleman stood with a question.  His organization is fighting an initiative by the national government that threatens local control in a way that is somewhat unfathomable in a democratic country.  They are fighting the good fight 24/7, with not a moment’s rest. Here is his question.
“What you are suggesting – focusing on our purpose, our vision for the community, our core values, and then creating our plans based on that – that would indeed bring us forward.  But the reality is we have no time to think.  We do not have time to close the doors and talk over these sorts of issues in a thoughtful way.  And while we are confident that taking that time will absolutely bring us farther forward than we will be if we don’t do so, we simply do not have the time.”
We all know the feeling.
In the consultant immersion courses we teach, much of the emphasis is on pre-planning everything a consultant does. “When you sit in the morning to line out your day, consider the following…” I tell the students.
In one class, one of the more seasoned consultants said what many of the others were thinking.  “Where do you find the time to do all this thinking?”
This “no time to think” and certainly the pressure to “do” vs. “explore” is most evident in board rooms of Community Benefit Organizations.  I wish I had a dollar for every board chair who told me, “We would like to talk about the impact we want to have in the community, but we don’t have time for that.  We have important and urgent matters that must take precedent.”
And what is it they feel is so much more important than exploring the impact they have in the community? We all know the answer: reviewing the financials and other internal matters.
So I guess my advice to boards and EDs and social entrepreneurs and funders who want to create more impact is the same as the advice I shared yesterday, in my conversation with Abbas.
Take time to think. Take time to explore and experiment. Take time to reflect on what is powerful in the discussion, to learn and grow and add that new learning into the next conversation.  Take time to discuss with no preconceived notion of the end result.
Take time to try new things – new programs that we are not sure will work but are better than not experimenting at all.
Take time to ask questions with no answers. Take more time to ask more questions, digging deeper until the answers find you.
At every board meeting. At every staff meeting. For a portion of every day.
Our power to change the world will not come from responding to day-to-day circumstances. That power will not come from reviewing the financials and the HR policies. The power to create change will not come from frantic doing doing doing. And it will not come from shying away from experimenting with approaches that are big and bold and unproven.
Our power to change the world will come from thoughtful conversation, experimentation and exploration – all aimed at the positive, powerful, amazing results we want to see in our communities.
So are you ready to take a moment, close the door, breathe deep, and just think?