Archive for the 'Funders' Category Page 4 of 5



11 Ways Funders Can Avoid Competition

This week’s Stop Sign on the Road to Changing the World was about Funding without Competition. Here are some easy ways funders can provide support without forcing their grantees to compete.

1- Fund Everyone:
Focus on an end result for the community, and invite all organizations who want to help create that end result to work together to develop an implementable plan to create that result. Fund that collaborative planning effort. Add support such as meeting space and facilitation of that planning work. (Find examples of how to do that Here)

2- Fund Everyone 2:
Once the group from #1 has created the plan, collaborate with other funders to fund the implementation of that plan. Focus that implementation on non-competitive / collaborative approaches for program development (see #4 for more). Add support such as meeting space and facilitation of the implementation.

3- Fund Everyone 3:
Focus on an issue. Invite all organizations interested in that issue to a meeting. Instruct them to act together, as a single team, to come up with a project they all want to work on together, regarding that issue. Fund what the group comes up with. Add support such as meeting space and facilitation of that planning work.

4- Teach How to Build Collaborative Programs:
To ensure success of those cooperatively built programs, provide educational opportunities for doing that. We have been taught for years how to build stand-alone programs. To counter that lone wolf tendency, bring experts to town who can teach how to build programs cooperatively, upon a base of shared resources and collective responsibility for every function of the program. (Find more on such approaches here.)

5- Fund Collaborative Capacity Building ONLY:
Commit to funding only capacity building efforts for groups of organizations, rather than individual organizations. Use the approach in #3 to have groups determine what they want to learn together. Or develop a comprehensive capacity building program, addressing the broad spectrum of infrastructure issues, and choose 5 or 10 (or however many) groups to all work together over a course of 2-3 years, to learn and grow together. Fund the consultant(s) to provide that work for the whole group. Add support such as meeting space. (Find a great example of collaborative capacity building HERE)

6- Stop Teaching How to Compete:
If you want the organizations in your community to stop competing, stop teaching them how to do it. Teach collaborative approaches, or stop teaching. Don’t teach folks to do what you do not want them to do! (And if you continue to teach how to compete, stop complaining about how competitive the organizations in your community are!)

7- Teach NonCompetitive Resource Development:
Asset-Based Approaches to Resource Development and Community Engagement teach how to build on the resources and assets an organization already has - including community resources such as other organizations.

8- Research Innovations in Inclusive / Non-competitive Funding:
Set aside funds to experiment with new ways of funding that are not competitive but inclusive. Brainstorm approaches at your next funder roundtable meeting, and encourage other funders to experiment as well.

9- Shared Data:
Look for opportunities to fund the development of shared data. Could hospitals benefit from shared access to patient information? Could poverty organizations benefit from shared access to case management information? See what systems could streamline data collection and retrieval for ALL organizations, and fund that.

10- Stop Fooling Yourself that Requiring Collaboration is Helping to Limit Competition:
If you have a competitive grant process, and you require / encourage / give preference to collaborative efforts, you still have a competitive grant process. You are just encouraging larger groups to compete against each other. Stop thinking this is doing anything but upping the competition ante! Instead, consider suggesting, “Preference will be given to projects that include every organization you currently consider your competition.” Now those would be grant requests I would love to read!

11- Make It Bigger:
When Lincoln, Nebraska’s Community Health Endowment was approached to fund solutions to one hospital’s Emergency Department issues, they turned that request into a multi-year, multi-hospital effort to address that need, once and for all, for all the city’s hospitals. (CLICK to learn more about that effort) Look for those same opportunities in your own grant applications. Is a single grant just a drop in the bucket, where a larger one might do the trick? Make that question part of the grant review for every application, and see how your funding priorities change!

Just because we have made competitive funding the norm, doesn’t mean it is the only way to provide those funds. If you want to see an end to all the competition in this sector, stop complaining and start doing whatever you can to ensure you are not contributing to that competitive environment!

Stop Sign: Competitive Funding

If this is the sector that was supposed to change the world, how come the world has not changed?

Part 1 of this Stop Sign addressed the first of these related questions: How can we develop a community-wide spirit of cooperation, rather than merely the window dressing of collaboration? And to encourage real cooperation, how can funders provide grants that don’t require competition?

This week, we will tackle Part 2 of that question. (To see other Stop Signs along the Road to Changing the World, just click here.)

STOP Sign: Competition and Collaboration (Part 2)
Are funders actually causing competition? And if so, how can funders provide funds in ways that do not encourage competition?

Picture this:
A funder wants to address a particular issue and create as much impact in the community as possible regarding that issue. The funder announces the following:

During this grant round, we have $150,000 to address X issue in our community. We will have another $150,000 next year, and another $150,000 the year after, for a total of $450,000 over 3 years.

If you are interested in addressing X issue, please attend a meeting on June 5. We will fund absolutely everyone who is interested in participating. Everyone. No kidding.

There is just one condition: You must all work together as a team, to comprehensively address the issue.

We will offer facilitation, conference space, and other types of support to assist this effort. And we will learn along with you, to be part of the solution.

Think that is outrageous? It happens. We have seen it. We have seen it create incredible results, faster than anyone thought possible.

In Lincoln, Nebraska, the Community Health Endowment did it with 3 area hospitals. One of those hospitals had applied for funding, to address an issue common in hospitals around the U.S. - use of their Emergency Room as primary care for folks with no other healthcare support. CHE knew that if they helped only one hospital fix its own ER problems, that solution would likely cause the other 2 local hospitals to absorb the overflow.

So CHE said, “We will fund you and support the effort with facilitation and other assistance. But we will only do so if the effort includes all 3 hospitals.”

The result? All 3 hospitals jointly created solutions. And within one year of instituting those solutions, there has been a 65% reduction in the number of non-emergency visits to those emergency rooms, and a 63% reduction in the costs related to those visits - a savings of more than $600,000 in one year. Best of all, 100% of all individuals who arrived at the hospital seeking non-emergency care now have a primary care provider. And 100% of those individuals now have prescription assistance. (For more info, check out CHE’s annual reports for 2005 and 2006.)

A win win win - for the hospitals, for the funder, but mostly for the patients, who can now receive more attentive care. And those results occurred in just the first year of the program!

Lincoln’s hospital scenario is not the only example. We have seen other instances of truly collaborative funding, where everyone who shows up gets funded. And we have even seen it in the seemingly proprietary area of capacity building. (Click here for a look at the subject of Shared Capacity Building from the provider perspective).

If funders are going to make collaboration a condition of funding, this is real collaboration. This is not just the mechanics of collaboration, but collaboration in spirit. It is collaboration that creates something stronger, and involves everyone. It is collaboration that builds trust and leads to other collaborations (which is exactly what is happening in Lincoln, BTW - those hospitals are now getting together on other projects, to address other issues - together!) And best of all, this is collaboration that will make our communities far better places to live.

Funders and Community Results
Part 1 of this post talked about the funder roundtables we host, facilitating funders in discussions about what it will take to create more significant impact in their communities. During those sessions, most of those funders walk into the room blaming the organizations they fund for the lack of more visionary, comprehensive impact in their communities.

By the end of those sessions, in part through the reasoning shared in these posts, they begin to see that blame doesn’t get us anywhere. And that funders can be creating significantly more impact, if they change the way they see things, and make small changes in the way they do their own work.

So what might be different if funders held themselves accountable for results in their communities? What might be different if funders dedicated themselves to learning along with the organizations they fund?

And what might be different if we ran over this Stop Sign of competitive funding once and for all, and dedicated ourselves to working together - all of us together, funders and providers side-by-side? What if instead of letting competitive funding stop us, we worked together to build an amazing community?

Click here for 11 Ways to Encourage Noncompetitive funding!

11 Ways Funders Can Encourage Collaboration

If competition is stopping us from achieving amazing things for our communities, how can we encourage collaboration? Here are some easy (and cheap!) ways funders can inspire and nurture a community-wide collaborative spirit.

1- Food and Friends: Host a monthly lunch. Invite organizations regardless of specialty - invite arts AND human services AND historic preservation AND animal welfare - everyone. Feed them buffet style. Have no agenda except one activity: Each attendee introduce him/herself to at least one person they do not already know. (Bonus: Increase the number of attendees you can afford to host by collaborating with another funder.)

2- More Food and Friends: Host a monthly lunch, inviting all the organizations from a single discipline (poverty OR mental health OR environment OR education). Feed them buffet style. Have no agenda except one activity: Each attendee introduce him/herself to at least one person they do not already know.

3- Don’t Be a Control Freak: Do not overly facilitate / control these sessions. Let people get to know each other. If possible, leave the room and leave them alone. If you can’t bear to leave, mingle, introduce, match-make. Or sit quietly and say nothing in the back of the room. This is their party. You are there to provide the space and food, and to help conversation flow - a true host.

4- Speaker on Community Topic: Once every quarter, host a lunch for all organizations in your community. Feature a speaker on a community issue of interest to everyone. Provide plenty of time before and after the speaker for unstructured conversation. (Bonus: Increase the number of attendees you can afford to host by collaborating with another funder.)

5- NO Capacity Building: Much of capacity building is about competing. Make these convening sessions about the collective whole. Make it about the community. If you have a presenter, do NOT have that person talk about any aspect of capacity building.

6- Exception to #5: DO talk about Community Capacity Building. That doesn’t mean “better fundraising for all” (i.e. capacity building for all organizations). It means a healthy community; an educated community; an environmentally robust community; an equitable community; an artistically integrated community.

7- More Community Capacity: Convene all organizations, across all silos / disciplines. Have them address this question together: What would our community look like if ALL our missions were 100% successful? (Bonus: Consider funding an effort to achieve that.)

8- Funders Collaborate: Yes, you. Find a project all your community’s funders can collaborate on (perhaps the outcome of #7!). Do NOT do what you accuse your grantees of doing - do not just all chip in money and have one funder administer it. Make it a truly collaborative effort, with each funder giving their time and expertise, as well as their dollars. Work together for real!

9- The $50,000 Challenge: Once every quarter, offer a $50,000 challenge (or more!). The challenge: All organizations who are interested, work together to create a project that will involve every organization in the room. What could you accomplish together, that you could not accomplish separately? Provide the $50,000 to fund what the group designs. This is not $50,000 to be split among those groups present. It is $50,000 for everyone together, or no one at all. Try this with all groups from one discipline - all the arts groups, all the environmental groups, all the housing groups, etc. Or try it across all disciplines, and see what bubbles up! (Bonus: Increase the size of the pot by collaborating with another funder.)

10- Board Members: Provide education for board members of your community’s organizations, re: what collaboration / cooperation really looks like. Business people often do not collaborate in their businesses, and the mechanics can therefore seem foreign to them. Cooperative work takes time. It is inclusive. It is often non-linear and may look “messy” to someone who has never done it. The more Board Members are prepared for that, the more they can support and encourage truly cooperative efforts to build community.

11- Communities of Practice: As people become comfortable with each other, offer to facilitate (or find professional facilitation for) any group that wants to move beyond these informal sessions, to become more of an ongoing Community of Practice / Learning Community.

Ok, so maybe there is also a #12: Brainstorm other ways - as many as you can - to inspire, nurture and support cooperation and collaboration in your community. When you find ways to encourage collaboration, rather than requiring it, you will be taking steps to create an indomitable force for building a healthy, vibrant, resilient place to live.

For a more in-depth look at why organizations compete instead of collaborate, click here.